Mormons, Migration and Murder

Most Mormons know little about these dark corners of their history, usually because they are told that they should not give credence to anything that is not “faith promoting”, which is too bad. In the last year, I have done my own reading on the history of the LDS sect and on Joseph Smith in particular.

The Washington Post has a recent review of two books on Mormon history. The first, Devil’s Gate: Brigham Young and the Great Mormon Handcart Tragedy by David Roberts, recounts the migration of Mormons to Utah in the mid-1850’s under Brigham Young’s leadership:

To save money and thereby maximize the number of Mormons able to make the trek, Young decided to forgo horse- and oxen-drawn wagons in favor of human-powered push carts. The handcarts cost a 10th of what wagons and draft animals did, and they promised to fill Utah with Mormons before too many gentiles arrived.

The journey of the handcart travelers from Iowa to Utah became a defining myth of Mormon history, the equivalent … of the voyage of the Mayflower in American colonial history. Subsequent generations of Mormons took pride in their descent from handcart pioneers; as with the Mayflower, more than a few of the claims of lineage were spurious.

[T]he mythmaking has a sinister aspect, crossing the line into historical cover-up. The handcart companies — as these traveling groups were called — suffered from hunger, disease, exposure and death; their mortality rate dramatically exceeded the average for overland companies, despite the fact that the Mormons traveled but half the distance covered by the much more numerous immigrants to California and Oregon. Most of the 3,000 handcart travelers treated the journey as a heavenly ordained test of their faith; Roberts, making compelling use of their diaries and other records, considers it a criminal fiasco imposed on the innocent migrants by the arrogant, unbending leaders of their church.

Throughout Devil’s Gate, Roberts shows great sympathy for the travelers but none for those who set them in motion.

The Mountain Meadows Massacre is a totally different story (Massacre at Mountain Meadows: An American Tragedy, Ronald W. Walker):

No such positive interpretation is possible regarding another, almost contemporary episode in early Mormon history. During the summer of 1857, an emigrant wagon train from Arkansas crossed Utah heading for California. The train had nearly cleared Mormon territory, reaching Mountain Meadows in the southeastern part of the settled region of Utah, when it was attacked by a band of Paiute Indians. Several members of the train were killed, and the survivors circled their wagons to defend themselves. After a few days of siege, a party of Mormons appeared and offered to escort the Arkansans past the Paiutes to safety. The Arkansans accepted the offer and filed out. A short distance from the wagons, the Mormons fell on the emigrants and massacred 120 adults and teenagers of both sexes, sparing only the young children.

For decades the leaders of the Mormon community concealed what happened at Mountain Meadows.

I recommend the following books if you want to understand the LDS sect:

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • StumbleUpon
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
This entry was posted on Friday, October 10th, 2008 at 3:39 pm and is filed under history, sects. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 comments

Travis:
 1 

Russ. I am suprised to see the animosity you portray towards Mormons.
Growing up LDS, I was very aware of the amount of casualties for those involved in “hand-cart” treks.
I was also aware of what has become known as the mountain meadows massacre and the horrible deeds of mormons.
These things aren’t hidden, we often learn of the sacrifices that many made to bring their families across the plains and we learn of idiots who have made awful decisions.
We’re not hiding anything…I can get you a list of criminals who were LDS at one time…including Butch Cassidy. We’ve definitely got our share of disappointments.
Russ, I know you are a good man and a good Christian who works hard to do things correctly, but it hurts to see that you are so critical of those of us who try to do the same however misguided you believe us to be.

December 26th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
 2 

Travis, I’m sorry if it seems that I have animosity towards Mormons themselves. I don’t. Most LDS folks I know are wonderful people!

But I do think the teachings of the LDS sect are contrary to Scripture and the leaders of the church have misled their people. So my criticisms are doctrinal and historical, not personal.

(You, as well as I, know that the history of Christendom, too—from the early church, through the Eastern and Western churches, Catholic and Protestant—has been riddled with sins and evil. In fact, the LDS leadership has very willing to be critical of historical Christianity on these terms and declare it an abomination!)

One of the sad results of Mormon-Evangelical dialogue is that it hasn’t been any such thing. We should be able to challenge each other on doctrine and history.

But this has not been the case. On both sides, there are simplistic diatribes based on misunderstanding of the other’s history and teaching.

Much of the books and articles produced by evangelicals about Mormonism is overly simplistic, sensationalistic, and disrespectful. And the same could be said of LDS apologetics and criticisms of Christianity.

Only in recent decades has the LDS church sought to be called “Christian”, after refusing to be identified with historic Christianity for most of its history.

But to be honest, I do believe that the LDS church misleads its followers, just as you must believe that I as a Christian am misguided if I reject the Book of Mormon and Joseph Smith.

To disagree and still respect each other is a good thing. And I respect you immensely! We see eye-to-eye on so many things, and you’re a perceptive, smart guy! Which is why we should be able to dialogue and disagree on eternal matters. If anything, it is most important to talk intelligently on such things, because they are more important than any other topic on earth!

December 29th, 2008 at 11:26 am
Travis:
 3 

Thanks Russ.
I definitely see your reasoning and I understand that as a true believer, you do need to declare what you feel is truth and what you feel is not.
I sat back the other day and thought about your comments and I agree that you should not shy away from offending someone if you believe strongly in something.
If someone doesn’t believe the doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, it would be hard to swallow the thought of people dying and freezing to death because they wanted to reach a physical destination sooner. I must respect the fact that many do not believe in the same doctrine as I do as a member of the LDS church.
God has said a lot of things that will forever offend people and for me to be offended by your particular stand on a piece of doctrine would be ludicrous.
Also, to say that you need to accept my beliefs would be totally ignorant on my part.
I definitely do have a lot of respect for you Russ and I don’t want you to think I harbor any bad feelings towards you or your comments. I understand that you are taking your beliefs seriously by proclaiming them and standing by them and I can do nothing more than tell you that I respect the time that you devote to searching out and proclaiming God’s wisdom.

December 31st, 2008 at 10:18 pm

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment